Questão 47

Leia atentamente o texto a seguir, do qual foram suprimidos alguns parágrafos, para responder às questões 46 e 47.

Few individuals have shaped the trajectory of an entire industry the way Ozires Silva shaped aviation. As a military pilot, engineer, entrepreneur, and public servant, Silva did not merely found Embraer — he repeatedly rescued, redirected, and reinvented it.

[I]

After joining the Brazilian Air Force at the age of 17, he flew missions across remote areas of the Amazon. There, he saw firsthand the vast distances and difficult terrain that separated Brazilians from one another, and began to understand aviation's power not just as a tool of transport, but as an agent of national integration.

[II]

After graduation, he joined the Centro Técnico Aeroespacial (CTA) and led the design of a small regional aircraft, the EMB-110 Bandeirante. But when it came time to move from prototype to production, Silva faced a defining obstacle: no investor would back the project. Brazil's industrial elite believed aircraft manufacturing was too risky, too expensive, and best left to the Americans or Europeans.

[III]

Under his leadership, Embraer launched successful aircraft like the Xingu, the Tucano, and the EMB-120 Brasilia, proving that Brazilian technology could compete globally. Each aircraft addressed a logistical challenge for Brazil while being designed with international scalability in mind.

[IV]

The privatization, completed in 1994, marked a turning point. Embraer quickly transitioned from a government-dependent firm to a lean, focused competitor in the international market. That transformation paved the way for the ERJ-145 regional jet, a commercial success that secured Embraer's position as a leader in regional aviation.

In 2021, Silva received the Daniel Guggenheim Medal, the most prestigious award in aeronautical engineering, becoming the first Brazilian to earn the honor. His personal convictions and professional decisions were inseparable from the company's transformation from a state-backed experiment into one of the world's most competitive aircraft manufacturers.

{ Fonte: OLIVEIRA, Renato. Ozires Silva: The living legend who built Embraer and transformed Brazil. AeroTime Hub, 15 ago. 2025. Adaptado.}

PARÁGRAFOS SUPRIMIDOS E EMBARALHADOS

(A) With conviction and diplomatic skill, Silva took his case to the federal government. In 1969, his efforts bore fruit: the state created Embraer, and Ozires Silva became its first president. As Silva built Embraer from the ground up, he faced the full spectrum of challenges: funding gaps, foreign competition, military skepticism, and bureaucratic inertia. But he also gained allies — engineers, test pilots, and industrialists who believed in the mission.

(B) Silva's story begins not in a boardroom or a laboratory, but in the interior of Sao Paulo state. Born in 1931 in Bauru, he came of age in a Brazil that relied on imported technologies and foreign industries. His journey began not with ambition for wealth or fame, but with a simple, patriotic question: Why can't Brazil build its own airplanes?

(C) Determined to change his country's course, Silva enrolled at the Instituto Tecnologico de Aeronautica (ITA), a newly created engineering school designed to empower Brazil's aerospace future. There, he honed the technical skills needed to turn vision into reality.

(D) Though the company grew, Silva realized Embraer's long-term success required independence from political cycles. In the late 1980s, he stepped away to serve as president of Petrobras and later as Minister of Infrastructure. But Embraer faltered under state control, and by the early 1990s, it faced severe financial trouble. Silva returned in 1991 to lead a bold and controversial initiative: privatization.

Assinale a alternativa que SUBSTITUI o termo destacado no excerto abaixo, preservando-se a mesma relação lógico-discursiva do original.

“Though the company grew, Silva realized Embraer's long-term success required independence from political cycles.”

A alternativa A está incorreta porque because transforma a concessão em causa. A frase passaria a dizer que Silva percebeu a necessidade de independência por causa do crescimento, quando o original diz que percebeu apesar do crescimento.
A alternativa B está correta porque much as é uma conjunção concessiva, registrada nos dicionários e nas gramáticas de referência com o sentido de although ou even though, e pode ocupar exatamente a mesma posição de though na frase. Much as the company grew, Silva realized mantém a ideia de que o crescimento poderia sugerir que tudo ia bem e que, ainda assim, Silva enxergou a fragilidade. É uma construção pouco ensinada no Brasil, mas correta e idiomática.
A alternativa C está incorreta porque whereas estabelece contraste entre duas situações paralelas, do tipo X é assim, ao passo que Y é assado. Aqui não há dois fatos comparados, há uma ressalva a um fato, o que caracteriza concessão. A alternativa cabe na frase do ponto de vista sintático, mas altera a relação lógica.
A alternativa D está incorreta e é a armadilha principal da questão. Nonetheless tem de fato valor concessivo, mas é um advérbio de ligação, e não uma conjunção. Ele não pode introduzir uma oração subordinada. Nonetheless the company grew, Silva realized é uma sequência sem estrutura possível em inglês. Para usá-lo seria preciso reescrever o período em duas orações, o que o enunciado não autoriza ao pedir a substituição do termo no excerto.
A alternativa E está incorreta porque therefore indica conclusão e, além disso, é advérbio, com o mesmo problema sintático de nonetheless. A relação de consequência também não corresponde ao original.